WATERVILLE TOWNSHIP – While a 67-page proposed revision to the zoning resolution is under legal review, Waterville Township leaders held a community forum on July 10 to ask for any last-minute suggestions and questions on the language that’s been developed over the past six months.
“Whatever we do has to be lawful and capable of surviving lawsuits without bankrupting the township,” said Trustee Toby Miller.
Miller, along with Trustee Julie Theroux and Board of Zoning Appeals Chair Roger Tucholski, read statements outlining their support for the zoning language, which would govern data centers and other large, campus-style projects by establishing an M-3 industrial classification with three tiers. The language does not approve a specific project or property for rezoning, but rather puts into place standards to protect the township, Tucholski said.
The document is the result of months of work by a Data Center Advisory Committee (DCAC) made up of citizens and township officials. Within the next few weeks, both the Zoning Commission and Board of Trustees will review it again and hold public hearings. Once approved, it will take effect in 30 days – prior to the Dec. 17 expiration of a one-year moratorium on data centers.
“We’re looking for questions and criticisms. If there is suggestion of something we can do better, we want to consider it,” Miller said, adding that legal counsel is currently considering increasing the property line setbacks for such developments from 500 feet to 1,000 feet for land adjacent to residences – including nursing homes and apartments – as well as schools and churches.
Lyn Cox thanked the township for its “Herculean” effort, which she said is much more than what other area communities have achieved during their moratoriums. She also asked about ensuring that a data center would discharge wastewater into a sanitary sewer rather than streams or lakes.
Many areas of the township don’t have sanitary sewer, Miller said, making it difficult for that requirement to be put into the document, but he said they would look into it.
Cox also asked about banning cryptocurrency mining, which emits noise well over the township limits. While such an enterprise would not likely be approved if the noise level is known at the time, Miller acknowledged that a data center might sell off space within the development – but that would be subject to the same noise regulations as all M-3 businesses. Putting a ban on any type of business would be difficult, but tightening up noise regulations is an option, he said.
Former Trustee Kim Anderson said she’s heard many residents ask why the trustees can’t just ban data centers or extend the moratorium for another year. Miller said Ohio Revised Code (ORC) won’t allow a complete ban because it would be considered a “take” – telling landowners what they can do with their property. And while other municipalities have tried extending a ban, that’s been challenged in court.
Whitehouse resident Leslie Harper brought several questions to the forum, including whether Waterville Township has unzoned areas, which Miller said are like the Wild West where landowners can do what they want, as zoning regulations don’t apply.
“Providence Township is the only township in Lucas County with unzoned areas,” said Jim Fischer, who serves as zoning inspector for both Providence and Waterville townships. “For them to change that, they would have to put it on the ballot for voters to approve. They tried 10 years ago and voters turned it down.”
Miller noted that anywhere in the AW area that a data center is built would impact the neighbors.
Harper asked whether the zoning resolution amendment includes pre-studies. That’s built into the zoning permit process, Miller said, with a requirement that funding be set aside for baseline measurements of water, noise, air quality and power usage, as well as approval from police and fire. Because Waterville Township has hard water, such a development would need to use municipal water, but Miller said he’s heard of cases where the water table is lowered after digging retention ponds. A bond will pay for monitoring those levels.
DCAC members Todd Heller, Brian Gowing and Russ Schifferly all recommend approving the 67-page zoning resolution, but shared their own concerns.
Schifferly, who served on the DCAC, said he recommends approval of the zoning resolution amendment, even if it’s not perfect – citing concerns about the need for regulation of ground water and air quality, which are regulated by the state.
“I feel like eventually someone needs to push the needle toward greater search for the proper balance between the rights of the citizens and the rights of the business that may want to come in and establish a data center,” he said, adding that there needs to be more regulatory change at the state level.
“The state has told us that we can’t submit a referendum for a township vote. That flies in the face of all our rights as citizens,” Schifferly added, referring to a process by which residents can collect signatures to put a zoning decision on the ballot within 30 days of its passage.
“That’s open for debate,” Miller said. “The state did pass something basically prohibiting mega projects from being put on the ballot as a referendum. However, it has a long list of requirements to be considered a mega project. I’m fairly certain we can overcome that state law based on those requirements – but I can’t change state law.”
He added that some proposals are at the state and federal level that would overturn whatever the township puts into place. One initiative seeks to classify data centers as a national security interest or utility. If it becomes a utility, eminent domain becomes a possibility.
“Call your senator. Call your representatives, both state and federal. Find laws that are pending and tell them what you think about them,” Miller said. “A lot of those laws are taking away the trustees’ power and taking away the residents’ voice.”
Risa Sindel, a Monclova Township resident, asked if there is a single action that deter data centers.
“Attending meetings, being a powerful voice and letting these large industrial complexes know how residents feel,” Theroux said. “Sign the petition circulating around for restrictions on data centers. Lucas County has done a wonderful job in getting signatures to get it on the ballot in 2027. Continue to be present at meetings and be a voice.”
The next public meeting for the zoning regulation changes is with the Zoning Commission on Monday, July 20 at 7 p.m., followed by a review by trustees on Wednesday, July 22 at 6:30 p.m.





















