Kenny Hetrick
has been caring for wild exotic animals at his Tiger Ridge compound for 40
years in Stony Ridge, and not once has one of his tigers escaped or harmed
someone, he said during a recent interview.
Hetrick
prides himself on his safety record but the Ohio Department of Agriculture sees
it differently.
The ODA recently inspected Hetricks compound after sending him a
letter giving him 10 days to abide by state regulations or hand over his
animals.
Despite running a seemingly healthy animal compound, Hetrick was
in violation of a state law passed in 2012 that regulates the exotic animal
industry. The law was signed after an incident near Zanesville in which dozens
of animals got loose and were shot and killed by law enforcement.
The letter to
Hetrick sent off a flurry of news articles, a Facebook page to save Hetrick’s
animals and action by the ODA to get Hetrick into compliance.
At least two
exotic animal experts accused Hetrick of dragging his feet and not accepting
help when help was offered. They called him stubborn, a man who loves his
animals, but who can’t care for them anymore. Hetrick refutes that.
Hetrick has
had two years to come into compliance with the law, but he said the permitting
process is expensive, and he’s “not a millionaire.”
But thanks to
donations by several hundred of Hetrick’s friends, he was able to submit the
permit with the $1,000 fee. He also made the upgrades to his compound as
required by the state regulators, which included new fencing, spay and
neutering, microchips and also a $500,000 insurance fee.
“Everything
they required, I did,” Hetrick said. “So what’s next? What’s next, I
have no clue.”
The ODA
remained closed lipped about its findings at Tiger Ridge. Erica Hawkins, ODA
communications director, would not comment on the inspection results or whether
Hetrick would be approved or denied a permit.
“We
don’t have a final report yet from the (inspection),” Hawkins said Dec. 3.
“We’re reviewing the legal status of Mr. Hetrick’s animal permit.”
Hetrick calls
Tiger Ridge a safe haven for his animals, many he’s had for 40 years. The
compound at 5359 Fremont Pike in Perrysburg houses six tigers and a black
leopard, which are considered endangered animals; two lions, a Kodiak brown
bear, a liger, a bobcat, and a wolf hybrid.
Andrew
Schuman, a Bowling Green attorney for Hetrick, said his client has always been
licensed by the US Department of Agriculture for “years and years”
(since 1987, according to Hetrick) and has always been in compliance. However,
there are no federal regulations for exotic animals.
The state law was considered necessary in response to the release
of dozens of bears, big cats, wolves and primates by their owner, Terry
Thompson, near Zanesville in 2011. Thompson committed suicide afterward. Many
of those animals were killed by law enforcement.
The new law, SB310, made it illegal to buy, sell or trade exotic
animals and to own many of them. Those who possess the animals before Jan. 1,
2014 are being allowed to get a permit.
Tiger Ridge
is not exempt from the law because it is not an accredited sanctuary with the
Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries.
So far, the ODA has permited more than 60 owners.
Hawkins said the ODA’s demands for compliance were basic
requirements, nothing a responsible animal owner wouldn’t want for their
compound.
Tim Harrison,
an ex-police officer and former owner of exotic animals who now trains first
responders in how to handle them, said he offered to donate fencing to Hetrick
when he was having difficulties finding the money to upgrade his facility.
Hetrick said no, Harrison said, leading him to believe Hetrick was just a
stubborn person, not interested in doing what was right for the animals.
“We have
been trying to help him for years,” said Harrison, who operates out of
Dayton.
Bobbi Brink
with Lions, Tigers and Bears, an animal rescue and sanctuary in California,
said she also ran up against Hetrick’s stubbornness when she offered to take
his animals for him when he ran afoul of the law. Hetrick flat out refused,
saying, “If I can’t have my animals, then no one can have them,”
according to Brink.
“I
believe the state is going to take action,” Brink said. “In all
honesty, for us here, we’re going to be dealing with him (Hetrick) now or
later. With private owners, they don’t want to give up, but they run out of
food, cages break down, so they finally figure out they can’t provide for the
animals.”
Hetrick
denied their claims, and said he has plenty of friends who helped him out of
his jam. Hetrick has said he only wants to care for the animals, most of which
are old, until they die. He is not rescuing any new animals.
“Most
people who do what I do don’t let people on their property,” Hetrick said.
“I’ve always been open (to the public) since day one. Never a day goes by
that someone’s not here. There’s nothing to hide. I don’t advertise, and
there’s no fee. I have a donation box. I don’t make a penny. This is what I
like, this is what I do.
“I’m not real sure what they’re (DOA) going to come up with,
but whatever they want me to do, I’m going to do it, and I have 1,200 friends
who will help me. They’ve been helping me all along.”
